Skip to content
Explore expert articles on technology trends, digital marke…

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Shape Trump's Political Legacy - and the United States' Position in the Global Order

Following executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be getting into the state-building business.

In a remarkable press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the president declared that US military forces had successfully apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a delegation including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the embattled nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a secure, proper and careful transition," he said.

What exactly "running the country" involves is unclear, but the pledge marks an abrupt shift in direction for the president, full of contradictions and formidable challenges.

A leader who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US efforts at regime change and who vowed to implement an "America first" foreign policy is now staking his presidency on successfully rebuilding a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose political stability has been eroded by decades of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was persistently optimistic.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no exception. He vowed to recruit American oil firms to repair Venezuela's deteriorating production infrastructure, supplying capital for the American reconstruction efforts and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you break it, you own it."

A Changed Global Approach

The US has redefined Venezuela's destiny – for better or worse.

Trump entered office nearly a year ago pledging to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has proven that he is quite prepared to use military force around the globe.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted nuclear facilities in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

Unlike past actions, which have largely involved rockets and warplanes that minimize the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his pledges to the fate of that nation – are strikingly distinct.

His aim, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Response at Home and Abroad

That variation of Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra might prove tough for some of Trump's followers to swallow.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who split from the president after accusing him of deserting his core supporters, was swift to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's never ending use of force and support of foreign wars is understandable because we are compelled to finance it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another prominent Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and halt fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the military action against a "criminal regime" as "firm and justified".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his press conference, the president said the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" agenda because it ensured US regional security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He revived the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will never be questioned again."

The goal of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "safeguard trade, territory and resources that are fundamental to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "home region."

Trump's choice to apprehend Maduro will raise broader questions in global politics, however, and impact American ties with the world's other major military powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement expressing shock and denouncing what it said was a irresponsible assault on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia after its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to broker a peace deal between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, expressed worry about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My primary concern is now Russia will use this to excuse their unlawful and barbaric operations against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an invasion of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic opponents were more direct.

"America should not be administering other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get entangled in endless wars and regime change missions that carry devastating consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a autocrat with a record of rights violations. But he censured Trump's choice not to inform congressional leaders before initiating the attack.

"The President has the legal duty to abide by the law and protect democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his press conference, explained that he opted not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "disclose" particulars of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a success – with no American deaths and limited harm to US assets. Trump, with his typical bravado, portrayed the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "one of the most stunning, effective and powerful demonstrations of American power and proficiency in American history."

Now he is betting his legacy on that victory enduring, as the US says it will take over running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that truly entails is unclear. He and his administration must fortify a nation that has been in turmoil for years while stabilising a hemisphere that is sure to be apprehensive of what Trump's foreign policy has in store for them.

About the author

Sylvia Johnson

A digital strategist with over a decade of experience in tech consulting, passionate about simplifying complex innovations for businesses.

QuickHarbor Blog

Type to search articles.